I can’t be the only one outraged by the idea that so much time has passed that director Roman Polanski has been punished enough for giving drugs to and then raping a 13-year-old girl in 1977. (Read more about the case here.)
And while I’m thankful the victim, who is now a 45-year-old mother of three who lives quietly in Hawaii, says she has made peace with the assault and moved on with her life, I don’t think that’s any reason to drop the charges.
In fact, it irks me to no end that she has petitioned the court to drop the charges and has, over the years, publicly insisted that it no longer bothers her so it should not bother anyone else, either.
Come on! Three decades ago, Polanski pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, but fled the country before sentencing. He admitted to telling a 13-year-old girl’s mother that he was going to photograph her for French Vogue, then took her a secluded house, gave her alcohol and a Quaalude and then raped her.
If the victim has forgiven him, that’s a wonderful milestone in her recovery. But Polanski broke the law and that is a matter for our judicial system to decide. Hearing Hollywood notables call the 30-plus-year manhunt and recent arrest excessive makes me wonder if they’d feel the same way if, heaven forbid, he had raped one of their daughters.
Roman Polanski should be prosecuted not only for the rape, but also for fleeing the country — regardless of how long ago it occurred.
What do you think?




